| Title |
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of A. Goel concerning “Clival screw and plate fixation by the transoral approach for the craniovertebral junction: a CT-based feasibility study” by Lin J, Kong G, Xu X, Liu Q, Huang Z, Zhu Q, and Ji W (Eur Spine J. 2019; doi:10.1007/s00586-019-06039-5)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-019-06137-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei Ji, Qingan Zhu, J. Lin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,691,046
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#2,516
of 4,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,546
of 340,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#31
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,702 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.