↓ Skip to main content

Imprecise evidence without imprecise credences

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Imprecise evidence without imprecise credences
Published in
Philosophical Studies, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11098-019-01336-7
Authors

Jennifer Rose Carr

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 44%
Professor 2 22%
Unspecified 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 5 56%
Computer Science 3 33%
Unspecified 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,581,198
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#691
of 1,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,539
of 340,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,293 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.