↓ Skip to main content

Perspectives on iteration in design and development

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Engineering Design, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
Title
Perspectives on iteration in design and development
Published in
Research in Engineering Design, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00163-016-0226-3
Authors

David C. Wynn, Claudia M. Eckert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 247 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 20%
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 8%
Researcher 20 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 7%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 60 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 83 33%
Computer Science 22 9%
Design 21 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 5%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 74 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2016.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Research in Engineering Design
#92
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,231
of 318,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Engineering Design
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.