↓ Skip to main content

先天性盲児はいかにして見えない自分に気づくのか―「見て」という発話行為の変遷をたどって

Overview of attention for article published in The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 220)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
先天性盲児はいかにして見えない自分に気づくのか―「見て」という発話行為の変遷をたどって
Published in
The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association, July 2019
DOI 10.4992/pacjpa.82.0_1pm-030
Authors

能智 正博, 園部 愛子, 片山 皓絵, 眞柄 翔太, 沖野 昇平, 風間 菜緒, 広津 侑実子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,485,623
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
#46
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,586
of 359,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.