You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Thinking Fast and Furious: Emotional Intensity and Opinion Polarization in Online Media
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Public Opinion Quarterly, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/poq/nfz042 |
| Authors |
David Asker, Elias Dinas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 94 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 26 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 9% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 55 | 59% |
| Scientists | 32 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 33 | 38% |
| Psychology | 8 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#755,479
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Public Opinion Quarterly
#96
of 1,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,746
of 352,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Opinion Quarterly
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.