| Title |
New insights into Neolithic milk consumption through proteomic analysis of dental calculus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-019-00911-7 |
| Authors |
Sophy Charlton, Abigail Ramsøe, Matthew Collins, Oliver E. Craig, Roman Fischer, Michelle Alexander, Camilla F. Speller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 33 | 28% |
| United States | 8 | 7% |
| Denmark | 6 | 5% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 47 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 80 | 68% |
| Scientists | 34 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 133 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 22 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Unknown | 44 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 313. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#110,620
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#5
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,074
of 355,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#1
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.