↓ Skip to main content

統治と謀略 ―インドネシア・スハルト体制における「謎の銃殺」事件

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Studies, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 129)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
統治と謀略 ―インドネシア・スハルト体制における「謎の銃殺」事件
Published in
Asian Studies, July 2019
DOI 10.11479/asianstudies.65.3_20
Authors

今村 祥子

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#6,768,278
of 25,537,395 outputs
Outputs from Asian Studies
#11
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,870
of 364,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Studies
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,537,395 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them