You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Modeling spatially and temporally complex range dynamics when detection is imperfect
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-019-48851-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Clark S. Rushing, J. Andrew Royle, David J. Ziolkowski, Keith L. Pardieck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 20 | 39% |
Canada | 4 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 2 | 4% |
Spain | 2 | 4% |
France | 2 | 4% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Czechia | 1 | 2% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 28 | 55% |
Members of the public | 23 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 28 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 21% |
Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 23 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 45% |
Environmental Science | 27 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Unknown | 26 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,316,381
of 25,346,731 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#12,895
of 139,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,242
of 347,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#322
of 3,343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,346,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.