↓ Skip to main content

Modeling spatially and temporally complex range dynamics when detection is imperfect

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modeling spatially and temporally complex range dynamics when detection is imperfect
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41598-019-48851-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clark S. Rushing, J. Andrew Royle, David J. Ziolkowski, Keith L. Pardieck

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 21%
Student > Master 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 23 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 45%
Environmental Science 27 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,316,381
of 25,346,731 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#12,895
of 139,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,242
of 347,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#322
of 3,343 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,346,731 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 139,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,343 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.