Title |
Mapping the cytokine profile of painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis in human bladder and urine specimens
|
---|---|
Published in |
World Journal of Urology, March 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00345-012-0852-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony T. Corcoran, Naoki Yoshimura, Vikas Tyagi, Bruce Jacobs, Wendy Leng, Pradeep Tyagi |
Abstract |
This study investigated the cytokine profile in bladder tissue and urine of painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis (PBS/IC) patients. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 30% |
Researcher | 6 | 26% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 26% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,170,310
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#810
of 2,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,567
of 160,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.