↓ Skip to main content

A neonatal prolonged QT syndrome due to maternal use of oral tricyclic antidepressants

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
A neonatal prolonged QT syndrome due to maternal use of oral tricyclic antidepressants
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00431-016-2722-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naoya Fukushima, Kenji Nanao, Hiroyuki Fukushima, Akira Namera, Masaru Miura

Abstract

It is known that tricyclic antidepressants induce long QT intervals associated with forms of life-threatening arrhythmia such as torsades de pointes (TdP), and these adverse effects may also occur in neonates whose mothers take tricyclic antidepressants. We report a neonatal case of prolonged QT interval and TdP caused by clomipramine that was transferred transplacentally from the mother. Administration of magnesium sulfate was effective to abolish TdP. When mothers take tricyclic antidepressants during pregnancy, their newborns should be watched carefully for drug-induced long QT syndrome and TdP. What is Known: •Tricyclic antidepressant can prolong the QT interval. It may be used for depression in pregnancy. What is New: •This is the first neonatal case report of prolonged QT interval and TdP caused by clomipramine transferred transplacentally from the mother.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 35%
Psychology 5 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,368,104
of 22,862,742 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#2,789
of 3,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,571
of 300,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,862,742 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.