| Title |
Rehabilitation of patients after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: pilot feasibility randomised trial of a home-based prevention programme
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x705509 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neil Heron, Frank Kee, Jonathan Mant, Margaret E Cupples, Michael Donnelly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 57% |
| Canada | 1 | 14% |
| Ireland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 270 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Researcher | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 40 | 15% |
| Unknown | 121 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 10% |
| Unknown | 126 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,749,210
of 25,137,221 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,295
of 4,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,949
of 347,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#42
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,137,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.