| Title |
Resistance is futile: RNA-sequencing reveals differing responses to bat fungal pathogen in Nearctic Myotis lucifugus and Palearctic Myotis myotis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-019-04499-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas M. Lilley, Jenni M. Prokkola, Anna S. Blomberg, Steve Paterson, Joseph S. Johnson, Gregory G. Turner, Tomáš Bartonička, Erik Bachorec, DeeAnn M. Reeder, Kenneth A. Field |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 27% |
| Finland | 6 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Croatia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 67% |
| Scientists | 15 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,278,323
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#124
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,574
of 353,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.