↓ Skip to main content

Plant functional group effects on peat carbon cycling in a boreal rich fen

Overview of attention for article published in Biogeochemistry, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Plant functional group effects on peat carbon cycling in a boreal rich fen
Published in
Biogeochemistry, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10533-019-00590-5
Authors

Danielle Rupp, Evan S. Kane, Catherine Dieleman, Jason K. Keller, Merritt Turetsky

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 6 14%
Lecturer 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 16 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 10%
Linguistics 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#5,269,881
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biogeochemistry
#262
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,251
of 353,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biogeochemistry
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.