| Title |
CMAJ’s next chapter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.191150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diane Kelsall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 19 | 58% |
| United States | 5 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 45% |
| Scientists | 8 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#742,194
of 25,199,971 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,149
of 9,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,760
of 347,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#25
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,199,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.