↓ Skip to main content

Early Pleistocene enamel proteome from Dmanisi resolves Stephanorhinus phylogeny

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
34 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
403 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early Pleistocene enamel proteome from Dmanisi resolves Stephanorhinus phylogeny
Published in
Nature, September 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41586-019-1555-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Enrico Cappellini, Frido Welker, Luca Pandolfi, Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal, Diana Samodova, Patrick L. Rüther, Anna K. Fotakis, David Lyon, J. Víctor Moreno-Mayar, Maia Bukhsianidze, Rosa Rakownikow Jersie-Christensen, Meaghan Mackie, Aurélien Ginolhac, Reid Ferring, Martha Tappen, Eleftheria Palkopoulou, Marc R. Dickinson, Thomas W. Stafford, Yvonne L. Chan, Anders Götherström, Senthilvel K. S. S. Nathan, Peter D. Heintzman, Joshua D. Kapp, Irina Kirillova, Yoshan Moodley, Jordi Agusti, Ralf-Dietrich Kahlke, Gocha Kiladze, Bienvenido Martínez-Navarro, Shanlin Liu, Marcela Sandoval Velasco, Mikkel-Holger S. Sinding, Christian D. Kelstrup, Morten E. Allentoft, Ludovic Orlando, Kirsty Penkman, Beth Shapiro, Lorenzo Rook, Love Dalén, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Jesper V. Olsen, David Lordkipanidze, Eske Willerslev

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 403 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Master 16 8%
Professor 12 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 49 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 16%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 8%
Arts and Humanities 15 7%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 63 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 560. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#43,102
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,696
of 98,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#832
of 352,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#99
of 971 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 971 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.