You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early Pleistocene enamel proteome from Dmanisi resolves Stephanorhinus phylogeny
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-019-1555-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Enrico Cappellini, Frido Welker, Luca Pandolfi, Jazmín Ramos-Madrigal, Diana Samodova, Patrick L. Rüther, Anna K. Fotakis, David Lyon, J. Víctor Moreno-Mayar, Maia Bukhsianidze, Rosa Rakownikow Jersie-Christensen, Meaghan Mackie, Aurélien Ginolhac, Reid Ferring, Martha Tappen, Eleftheria Palkopoulou, Marc R. Dickinson, Thomas W. Stafford, Yvonne L. Chan, Anders Götherström, Senthilvel K. S. S. Nathan, Peter D. Heintzman, Joshua D. Kapp, Irina Kirillova, Yoshan Moodley, Jordi Agusti, Ralf-Dietrich Kahlke, Gocha Kiladze, Bienvenido Martínez-Navarro, Shanlin Liu, Marcela Sandoval Velasco, Mikkel-Holger S. Sinding, Christian D. Kelstrup, Morten E. Allentoft, Ludovic Orlando, Kirsty Penkman, Beth Shapiro, Lorenzo Rook, Love Dalén, M. Thomas P. Gilbert, Jesper V. Olsen, David Lordkipanidze, Eske Willerslev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 402 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 45 | 11% |
| Spain | 37 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 6% |
| Denmark | 17 | 4% |
| France | 12 | 3% |
| Germany | 9 | 2% |
| Mexico | 9 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Colombia | 6 | 1% |
| Other | 69 | 17% |
| Unknown | 168 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 266 | 66% |
| Scientists | 122 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 8 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 212 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 8% |
| Professor | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 34 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 14 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 63 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 560. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#43,492
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,710
of 98,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#835
of 352,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#99
of 971 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,606 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 971 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.