↓ Skip to main content

Psychogenic Infertility—Myths and Facts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
Title
Psychogenic Infertility—Myths and Facts
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, December 2003
DOI 10.1023/b:jarg.0000013648.74404.9d
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tewes H. Wischmann

Abstract

The hypothesis of this review is that the role of psychological factors as the sole cause of infertility is generally overrated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 87 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 28%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#2,655,790
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#130
of 1,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,026
of 142,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them