| Title |
Rethinking Iberian ‘warrior’ stelae: a multidisciplinary investigation of Mirasiviene and its connection to Setefilla (Lora del Río, Seville, Spain)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-019-00909-1 |
| Authors |
Marta Díaz-Guardamino, Leonardo García Sanjuán, David W. Wheatley, José Antonio Lozano Rodríguez, Miguel Ángel Rogerio Candelera, Michał Krueger, Marta Krueger, Mark Hunt Ortiz, Mercedes Murillo-Barroso, Veronica Balsera Nieto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 22% |
| Spain | 3 | 17% |
| Sweden | 2 | 11% |
| Poland | 2 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 16% |
| Librarian | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 47% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,973,194
of 24,876,519 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#203
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,344
of 346,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#5
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,876,519 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.