| Title |
How widespread is working at scale in English general practice? An observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x705533 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lindsay Jl Forbes, Hannah Forbes, Matt Sutton, Katherine Checkland, Stephen Peckham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 73% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 22% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,357,363
of 23,996,277 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#673
of 4,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,583
of 343,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#13
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,996,277 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.