↓ Skip to main content

Doing Good Leads to More Good: The Reinforcing Power of a Moral Self-Concept

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Philosophy and Psychology, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Doing Good Leads to More Good: The Reinforcing Power of a Moral Self-Concept
Published in
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13164-012-0111-6
Authors

Liane Young, Alek Chakroff, Jessica Tom

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 95 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 28%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Professor 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 53%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 10%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Philosophy 5 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 17 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2016.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#308
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,684
of 189,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.