↓ Skip to main content

単一事例実験データの分析方法としてのランダマイゼーション検定

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 116)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
単一事例実験データの分析方法としてのランダマイゼーション検定
Published in
Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis, June 2017
DOI 10.24456/jjba.13.1_44
Authors

山田 剛史

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#14,907,061
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis
#47
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,875
of 329,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Behavior Analysis
#19
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.