| Title |
Nodding and napping in medical lectures: an instructive systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, December 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.051157 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth Rockwood, Christopher J Patterson, David B Hogan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 27% |
| United States | 6 | 16% |
| Canada | 4 | 11% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 51% |
| Scientists | 10 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 27% |
| Unknown | 2 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 17% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,805,868
of 25,597,324 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2,167
of 9,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,511
of 162,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#5
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,597,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.