↓ Skip to main content

Nitrogen Identity Drives Differential Impacts of Nutrients on Coral Bleaching and Mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
79 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Nitrogen Identity Drives Differential Impacts of Nutrients on Coral Bleaching and Mortality
Published in
Ecosystems, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10021-019-00433-2
Authors

Deron E. Burkepile, Andrew A. Shantz, Thomas C. Adam, Katrina S. Munsterman, Kelly E. Speare, Mark C. Ladd, Mallory M. Rice, Leïla Ezzat, Shelby McIlroy, Jane C. Y. Wong, David M. Baker, Andrew J. Brooks, Russell J. Schmitt, Sally J. Holbrook

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 12%
Researcher 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 50 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 28%
Environmental Science 23 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 6%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 59 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#5,466,525
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#473
of 1,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,240
of 354,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,446 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.