You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
爬虫類の分類学・系統学・生物地理学―分岐分類学の問題点
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.19004/taxa.47.0_1 |
| Authors |
疋田 努 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 29% |
| Unknown | 22 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 94% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,398,141
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#12
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,303
of 360,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them