↓ Skip to main content

Review of: Ifenthaler, D., Mah, D.,

Overview of attention for article published in TechTrends, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Review of: Ifenthaler, D., Mah, D., & Yau, J.Y. (Eds). (2019). Utilizing analytics to support study success. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64792-0
Published in
TechTrends, September 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11528-019-00431-0
Authors

David Gibson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 17%
Psychology 1 17%
Social Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,218,560
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from TechTrends
#441
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,245
of 343,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age from TechTrends
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,497 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.