↓ Skip to main content

An integrated view of the chemistry and mineralogy of martian soils

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, July 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
351 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An integrated view of the chemistry and mineralogy of martian soils
Published in
Nature, July 2005
DOI 10.1038/nature03637
Pubmed ID
Authors

Albert S. Yen, Ralf Gellert, Christian Schröder, Richard V. Morris, James F. Bell, Amy T. Knudson, Benton C. Clark, Douglas W. Ming, Joy A. Crisp, Raymond E. Arvidson, Diana Blaney, Johannes Brückner, Philip R. Christensen, David J. DesMarais, Paulo A. de Souza, Thanasis E. Economou, Amitabha Ghosh, Brian C. Hahn, Kenneth E. Herkenhoff, Larry A. Haskin, Joel A. Hurowitz, Bradley L. Joliff, Jeffrey R. Johnson, Göstar Klingelhöfer, Morten Bo Madsen, Scott M. McLennan, Harry Y. McSween, Lutz Richter, Rudi Rieder, Daniel Rodionov, Larry Soderblom, Steven W. Squyres, Nicholas J. Tosca, Alian Wang, Michael Wyatt, Jutta Zipfel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 231 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 21%
Researcher 47 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Master 17 7%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 41 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 100 41%
Physics and Astronomy 30 12%
Chemistry 15 6%
Engineering 14 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 41 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2022.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#70,663
of 97,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,334
of 67,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#305
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.