You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Systematic Review on 3D-Printed Imaging and Dosimetry Phantoms in Radiation Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1533033819870208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rance Tino, Adam Yeo, Martin Leary, Milan Brandt, Tomas Kron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 182 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 72 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 29 | 16% |
| Engineering | 22 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 13% |
| Unknown | 77 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,969,641
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
#26
of 1,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,075
of 347,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
#1
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,506 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.