You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hospital-level evaluation of the effect of a national quality improvement programme: time-series analysis of registry data
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMJ Quality & Safety, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009537 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Timothy J Stephens, Carol J Peden, Ryan Haines, Mike P W Grocott, Dave Murray, David Cromwell, Carolyn Johnston, Sarah Hare, Jose Lourtie, Sharon Drake, Graham P Martin, Rupert M Pearse |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 28 | 43% |
Australia | 4 | 6% |
Spain | 3 | 5% |
South Africa | 3 | 5% |
United States | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 37 | 57% |
Scientists | 14 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Researcher | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 18% |
Unknown | 21 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 37% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,013,765
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Quality & Safety
#393
of 2,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,220
of 352,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Quality & Safety
#11
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.