| Title |
The epidemiology of intransient TB-induced hyperglycaemia in previously undiagnosed diabetes mellitus 2 individuals: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1143-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonia Menon, Joel Francis, Natasha Zdraveska, Alfred Dusabimana, Samit Bhattacharyya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 30 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2023.
All research outputs
#16,620,927
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,703
of 2,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,576
of 345,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#22
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.