| Title |
Prognostic occupational factors for persistent low back pain in primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00420-012-0761-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Markus Melloh, Achim Elfering, Cathy M. Chapple, Anja Käser, Cornelia Rolli Salathé, Thomas Barz, Christoph Röder, Jean-Claude Theis |
| Abstract |
To reduce the socio-economic burden of persistent low back pain (LBP), factors influencing the progression of acute/subacute LBP to the persistent state must be identified at an early stage. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2014.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#895
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,910
of 176,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#9
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.