↓ Skip to main content

移行しやすく使いやすいデジタルアーカイブの構築:教育図書館貴重資料デジタルコレクションの経験から

Overview of attention for article published in Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
移行しやすく使いやすいデジタルアーカイブの構築:教育図書館貴重資料デジタルコレクションの経験から
Published in
Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi, March 2019
DOI 10.2964/jsik_2019_016
Authors

江草 由佳

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#16,554,411
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,882
of 356,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Joho Chishiki Gakkaishi
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 247.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them