↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of different methods of half-diallel analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, February 1984
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
A comparison of different methods of half-diallel analysis
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, February 1984
DOI 10.1007/bf00272868
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Singh, R. K. Singh

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 25%
Student > Master 2 17%
Lecturer 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 75%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2012.
All research outputs
#21,141,111
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3,320
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,820
of 36,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.