↓ Skip to main content

A review on methods and software for fuzzy cognitive maps

Overview of attention for article published in Artificial Intelligence Review, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
A review on methods and software for fuzzy cognitive maps
Published in
Artificial Intelligence Review, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10462-017-9575-1
Authors

Gerardo Felix, Gonzalo Nápoles, Rafael Falcon, Wojciech Froelich, Koen Vanhoof, Rafael Bello

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 19%
Student > Master 26 13%
Researcher 21 10%
Other 12 6%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 60 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 32 16%
Computer Science 28 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 6%
Environmental Science 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 67 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,691,046
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Artificial Intelligence Review
#630
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,697
of 319,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Artificial Intelligence Review
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.