↓ Skip to main content

How Can I Know What I Don't Know? Poor Self Assessment in a Well-Defined Domain

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Health Sciences Education, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
How Can I Know What I Don't Know? Poor Self Assessment in a Well-Defined Domain
Published in
Advances in Health Sciences Education, September 2004
DOI 10.1023/b:ahse.0000038209.65714.d4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin W. Eva, John P.W. Cunnington, Harold I. Reiter, David R. Keane, Geoffrey R. Norman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Canada 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 237 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 12%
Professor 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 10%
Student > Master 22 9%
Other 85 34%
Unknown 35 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 38%
Social Sciences 40 16%
Psychology 30 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 3%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 29 12%
Unknown 44 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#451
of 939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,035
of 69,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Health Sciences Education
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.