You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Direct bone marrow HSC transplantation enhances local engraftment at the expense of systemic engraftment in NSG mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep23886 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Futrega, William B. Lott, Michael R. Doran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,856,073
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#24,824
of 143,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,349
of 317,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#579
of 3,104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,017 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.