You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Process-Knowledge Model of Health Literacy: Evidence from a Componential Analysis of Two Commonly Used Measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Health Communication, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10810730.2011.604702 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessie Chin, Daniel G. Morrow, Elizabeth A. L. Stine-Morrow, Thembi Conner-Garcia, James F. Graumlich, Michael D. Murray |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 24% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
| Psychology | 12 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,683,750
of 22,663,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Communication
#443
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,629
of 131,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Communication
#18
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,969 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.