| Title |
Extensions of theories from soft limits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of High Energy Physics, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/jhep06(2016)170 |
| Authors |
Freddy Cachazo, Peter Cha, Sebastian Mizera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 56% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 17% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 78% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,168,167
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of High Energy Physics
#4,748
of 24,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,228
of 367,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of High Energy Physics
#71
of 474 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,151 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 474 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.