| Title |
The Near-Miss Effect in Slot Machines: A Review and Experimental Analysis Over Half a Century Later
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gambling Studies, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10899-019-09891-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey M. Pisklak, Joshua J. H. Yong, Marcia L. Spetch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 15% |
| Finland | 4 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Canada | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 53% |
| Scientists | 9 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 10 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#497,279
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#25
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,325
of 354,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.