↓ Skip to main content

Creating “companions” for children: the ethics of designing esthetic features for robots

Overview of attention for article published in AI & SOCIETY, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Creating “companions” for children: the ethics of designing esthetic features for robots
Published in
AI & SOCIETY, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00146-012-0431-1
Authors

Yvette Pearson, Jason Borenstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 46 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 10 20%
Computer Science 9 18%
Social Sciences 7 14%
Psychology 5 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 8%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 8 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#17,394,032
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from AI & SOCIETY
#572
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,950
of 186,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AI & SOCIETY
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them