| Title |
Is the joint-angle specificity of isometric resistance training real? And if so, does it have a neural basis?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-019-04229-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcel B. Lanza, Thomas G. Balshaw, Jonathan P. Folland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 16% |
| United States | 8 | 14% |
| Spain | 5 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| Finland | 2 | 4% |
| Brazil | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Lithuania | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 61% |
| Scientists | 20 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 25 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 54 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,269,944
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#401
of 4,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,375
of 352,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.