You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: The landscape of epilepsy-related GATOR1 variants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41436-018-0325-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Baldassari, Fabienne Picard, Nienke E. Verbeek, Marjan van Kempen, Eva H. Brilstra, Gaetan Lesca, Valerio Conti, Renzo Guerrini, Francesca Bisulli, Laura Licchetta, Tommaso Pippucci, Paolo Tinuper, Edouard Hirsch, Anne de Saint Martin, Jamel Chelly, Gabrielle Rudolf, Mathilde Chipaux, Sarah Ferrand-Sorbets, Georg Dorfmüller, Sanjay Sisodiya, Simona Balestrini, Natasha Schoeler, Laura Hernandez-Hernandez, S. Krithika, Renske Oegema, Eveline Hagebeuk, Boudewijn Gunning, Charles Deckers, Bianca Berghuis, Ilse Wegner, Erik H. Niks, Floor E. Jansen, Kees Braun, Daniëlle de Jong, Guido Rubboli, Inga Talvik, Valentin Sander, Peter Uldall, Marie-Line Jacquemont, Caroline Nava, Eric Leguern, Sophie Julia, Antonio Gambardella, Giuseppe d’Orsi, Giovanni Crichiutti, Laurence Faivre, Veronique Darmency, Barbora Benova, Pavel Krsek, Arnaud Biraben, Anne-Sophie Lebre, Mélanie Jennesson, Shifteh Sattar, Cécile Marchal, Douglas R NordliJr, Kristin Lindstrom, Pasquale Striano, Lysa Boissé Lomax, Courtney Kiss, Fabrice Bartolomei, Anne Fabienne Lepine, An-Sofie Schoonjans, Katrien Stouffs, Anna Jansen, Eleni Panagiotakaki, Brigitte Ricard-Mousnier, Julien Thevenon, Julitta de Bellescize, Hélène Catenoix, Thomas Dorn, Martin Zenker, Karen Müller-Schlüter, Christian Brandt, Ilona Krey, Tilman Polster, Markus Wolff, Meral Balci, Kevin Rostasy, Guillaume Achaz, Pia Zacher, Thomas Becher, Thomas Cloppenborg, Christopher J. Yuskaitis, Sarah Weckhuysen, Annapurna Poduri, Johannes R. Lemke, Rikke S. Møller, Stéphanie Baulac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 75% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 75% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#2,842
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,608
of 351,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#84
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.