| Title |
Combining transcranial direct-current stimulation with gait training in patients with neurological disorders: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-019-0591-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rubén Hernández de Paz, Diego Serrano-Muñoz, Soraya Pérez-Nombela, Elisabeth Bravo-Esteban, Juan Avendaño-Coy, Julio Gómez-Soriano |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 24% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Scientists | 6 | 35% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 134 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 50 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,753,940
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#133
of 1,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,722
of 341,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.