↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review
Published in
The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, April 2016
DOI 10.1017/cjn.2016.30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Lambrinos, Alexis K. Schaink, Irfan Dhalla, Timo Krings, Leanne K. Casaubon, Nancy Sikich, Cheemun Lum, Aditya Bharatha, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Grant Stotts, Gustavo Saposnik, Linda Kelloway, Xuanqian Xie, Michael D. Hill

Abstract

Although intravenous thrombolysis increases the probability of a good functional outcome in carefully selected patients with acute ischemic stroke, a substantial proportion of patients who receive thrombolysis do not have a good outcome. Several recent trials of mechanical thrombectomy appear to indicate that this treatment may be superior to thrombolysis. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of new-generation mechanical thrombectomy devices with intravenous thrombolysis (if eligible) compared with intravenous thrombolysis (if eligible) in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by a proximal intracranial occlusion. We systematically searched seven databases for randomized controlled trials published between January 2005 and March 2015 comparing stent retrievers or thromboaspiration devices with best medical therapy (with or without intravenous thrombolysis) in adults with acute ischemic stroke. We assessed risk of bias and overall quality of the included trials. We combined the data using a fixed or random effects meta-analysis, where appropriate. We identified 1579 studies; of these, we evaluated 122 full-text papers and included five randomized control trials (n=1287). Compared with patients treated medically, patients who received mechanical thrombectomy were more likely to be functionally independent as measured by a modified Rankin score of 0-2 (odds ratio, 2.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.88-3.04; I2=0%). This finding was robust to subgroup analysis. Mortality and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage were not significantly different between the two groups. Mechanical thrombectomy significantly improves functional independence in appropriately selected patients with acute ischemic stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 185 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 15%
Other 24 13%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 6%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 50 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 33%
Neuroscience 17 9%
Psychology 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 61 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2018.
All research outputs
#2,324,053
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
#70
of 1,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,973
of 316,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,294 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.