| Title |
A comparison of trapping efficacy of 11 rodent traps in agriculture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Mammal Research, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13364-019-00424-7 |
| Authors |
Yoav Motro, Yotam Ghendler, Yoav Muller, Yair Goldin, Olga Chagina, Ayla Rimon, Yehonathan Harel, Uzi Motro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 18% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 43% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,691,046
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Mammal Research
#316
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,007
of 351,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mammal Research
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.