You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Immunophenotyping of Human B Lymphocytes in Blood and in Adipose Tissue
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Immunophenotyping
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-9650-6_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-9649-0, 978-1-4939-9650-6
|
| Authors |
Diaz, Alain, Romero, Maria, Frasca, Daniela, Blomberg, Bonnie B., Alain Diaz, Maria Romero, Daniela Frasca, Bonnie B. Blomberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 31% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#14,457,391
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,262
of 13,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,695
of 340,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#25
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,283 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.