| Title |
Diagnostics and treatment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: where do we stand?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11060-019-03287-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fatma E. El-Khouly, Sophie E. M. Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Vicente Santa-Maria Lopez, N. Harry Hendrikse, Gertjan J. L. Kaspers, G. Loizos, David Sumerauer, Karsten Nysom, Kaie Pruunsild, Virve Pentikainen, Halldora K. Thorarinsdottir, Giedre Rutkauskiene, Victor Calvagna, Monika Drogosiewicz, Monica Dragomir, Ladislav Deak, Lidija Kitanovski, Andre O. von Bueren, Rejin Kebudi, Irene Slavc, Sandra Jacobs, Filip Jadrijevic-Cvrlje, Natacha Entz-Werle, Jacques Grill, Antonis Kattamis, Peter Hauser, Jane Pears, Veronica Biassoni, Maura Massimino, Enrique Lopez Aguilar, Ingrid K. Torsvik, Maria Joao Gil-da-Costa, Ella Kumirova, Ofelia Cruz-Martinez, Stefan Holm, Simon Bailey, Tim Hayden, Ulrich W. Thomale, Geert O. R. Janssens, Christof M. Kramm, Dannis G. van Vuurden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 28 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,264,930
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#748
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,925
of 340,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#19
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.