↓ Skip to main content

Sleep Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Sleep Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11910-016-0649-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiffany J. Braley, Eilis Ann Boudreau

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) are at increased risk for sleep disturbances and that sleep disturbances contribute to fatigue and other chronic symptoms in MS. Although fatigue occurs commonly in people with MS, this symptom is often attributed to MS-specific pathology. Consequently, sleep disorders are often unrecognized and untreated in this population. Timely diagnosis and treatment of sleep problems in MS offer a new opportunity to ameliorate some of the daytime fatigue experienced by patients with MS. To increase this opportunity, the practitioner should be comfortable performing basic screening for common sleep complaints among patients with MS. The objectives of this review are to summarize the latest relevant data on sleep disorders in MS and offer a helpful approach to the identification and workup of the most common sleep problems in this population. Unexplored research avenues and opportunities to address important questions at the interface of sleep and MS are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 106 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 27%
Neuroscience 11 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Psychology 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,459,680
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#127
of 921 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,799
of 301,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 921 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.