Title |
The evolution of surgical treatment for gastrointestinal cancers
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Oncology, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10147-019-01499-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yoshihiko Maehara, Yuji Soejima, Tomoharu Yoshizumi, Naoyuki Kawahara, Eiji Oki, Hiroshi Saeki, Tomohiko Akahoshi, Toru Ikegami, Yo-ichi Yamashita, Tadashi Furuyama, Keishi Sugimachi, Noboru Harada, Tetsuzo Tagawa, Norifumi Harimoto, Shinji Itoh, Hideto Sonoda, Koji Ando, Yuichiro Nakashima, Yoshihiro Nagao, Nami Yamashita, Yuta Kasagi, Takafumi Yukaya, Takeshi Kurihara, Ryosuke Tsutsumi, Shinkichi Takamori, Shun Sasaki, Tetsuo Ikeda, Yoshikazu Yonemitsu, Takasuke Fukuhara, Hiroyuki Kitao, Makoto Iimori, Yuki Kataoka, Takeshi Wakasa, Masami Suzuki, Koji Teraishi, Yasuto Yoshida, Masaki Mori |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 21% |
Unknown | 13 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,053,192
of 23,163,378 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#366
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,553
of 340,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Oncology
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,163,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.