↓ Skip to main content

Biodegradation of Single‐Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Eosinophil Peroxidase

Overview of attention for article published in Small, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
172 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biodegradation of Single‐Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Eosinophil Peroxidase
Published in
Small, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/smll.201202508
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando T. Andón, Alexandr A. Kapralov, Naveena Yanamala, Weihong Feng, Arjang Baygan, Benedict J. Chambers, Kjell Hultenby, Fei Ye, Muhammet S. Toprak, Birgit D. Brandner, Andrea Fornara, Judith Klein‐Seetharaman, Gregg P. Kotchey, Alexander Star, Anna A. Shvedova, Bengt Fadeel, Valerian E. Kagan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 20%
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Master 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 18 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 10%
Materials Science 9 8%
Environmental Science 8 7%
Engineering 8 7%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 32 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,739,163
of 24,585,562 outputs
Outputs from Small
#583
of 7,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,859
of 197,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Small
#4
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,585,562 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.