↓ Skip to main content

Identification of a Major Human Urinary Metabolite of Alachlor by LC-MS/MS

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Identification of a Major Human Urinary Metabolite of Alachlor by LC-MS/MS
Published in
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, June 1996
DOI 10.1007/s001289900124
Pubmed ID
Authors

W. J. Driskell, R. H. Hill, Jr., D. B. Shealy, R. D. Hull, C. J. Hines

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%
Chemistry 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#8,022,830
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#816
of 4,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,757
of 28,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 28,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.